I know that 100% of the people who read this blog regularly have absolutely no interest in this post at all. The reason I am writing is because I think that this needs to be a queryable question in Google since it took me quite a while to figure out how to do it.
So on with the explanation for those who come here one day via Google...
I was using a CFMAIL tag to send a query driven data set to an end user in a report at work. The dataset was a list of requisitions. I had an additional dataset that needed to be in the post as well. I needed to include Notes about the delivery within the email detailing the requisitions.
Coldfusion kept throwing an error because I had a query driven <cfoutput> inside of an existing query driven <cfoutput> since <cfmail> is functionally a query driven <cfoutput> I had used the group function to ensure the data would be output only once, but still the coldfusion server did not like the request.
In order to output my data I would need to use a <cfloop> and output a specific row from a query on each loop through the data. My problem was that documentation for displaying a specific query row was nonexistent in the LiveDocs and negligible on the web. I did find some old posts but their instructions did not work in Coldfusion 7.
So after trial and error using the limited old sources I had, I discovered the correct syntax was #queryname.querycolumn[row]#. I am sure this is not news at all to a more experienced programmer but it was HUGE for me since it was not well documented.
In the end my query driven output within a query driven output looked like this:
<cfif #queryname.recordcount# gt 0>
<cfset currentrecord=" 1">
<cfloop index="currentrecord" from="1" to="#queryname.recordcount#">
#queryname.querycolumn[currentrecord]#
<cfset currentrecord= #currentrecord# + 1>
</cfloop>
</cfif>
I hope this helps save you the time I spent!
WOW! Thanks. I was just getting ready to do that very thing and this sure made it all make sense to me.
ReplyDeleteAll you had to do is IM me...
ReplyDeleteI use the syntax all the time...
I try not to IM you until I have exhausted attempting to figure it out for myself. I did figure it out.... It just took me a while. It does SUCK that it is so poorly documented!
ReplyDelete